What do you think of the service FraudRecord.com provides for the "quality assurance" on the provider side when deciding whether to initiate a business relationship with a customer?
My opinion is that FR is a good service -- especially since its mostly internal, limited to providers themselves, and then the provider can make a judgement on their own based on the information provided. Not enough info for the providers liking? Sign the client up. Don't like what you are seeing? Decline to begin the business relationship.
I think it's about time that us providers have a way to share potential problem clients in a respectable manner.
Don't forget -- Just how clients can pick and choose their host, us hosts also have the right to refuse service to clients. The bad thing is that while our reviews of clients are internal, anything clients usually post (whether true, false, mis-information, misleading, etc) is normally on a public forum -- and you know other potential customers will get the wrong idea (if its not the truth...).
So... your thoughts on FraudRecord? What inspired this convo is a currently active thread on WHT. Here it is for reference: http://ift.tt/1vUFRte
I think this customer definitely deserves the listing based on just his behavior in the thread.
http://ift.tt/1dvHQ0Z
0 comments:
Post a Comment